skip to main content
10.1145/3242969.3242990acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Multimodal Analysis of Client Behavioral Change Coding in Motivational Interviewing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a widely disseminated and effective therapeutic approach for behavioral disorder treatment. Over the past decade, MI research has identified client language as a central mediator between therapist skills and subsequent behavior change. Specifically, in-session client language referred to as change talk (CT; personal arguments for change) or sustain talk (ST; personal argument against changing the status quo) has been directly related to post-session behavior change. Despite the prevalent use of MI and extensive studies of MI underlying mechanisms, most existing studies focus on the linguistic aspect of MI, especially of client change talk and sustain talk and how they as a mediator influence the outcome of MI. In this study, we perform statistical analyses on acoustic behavior descriptors to test their discriminatory powers. Then we utilize multimodality by combining acoustic features with linguistic features to improve the accuracy of client change talk prediction. Lastly, we investigate into our trained model to understand what features inform the model about client utterance class and gain insights into the nature of MISC codes.

References

  1. Oleg Akhtiamov, Maxim Sidorov, Alexey A. Karpov, and Wolfgang Minker . 2017. Speech and Text Analysis for Multimodal Addressee Detection in Human-Human-Computer Interaction. In Proc. Interspeech 2017. 2521--2525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brian Borsari, Timothy Apodaca, Kristina Jackson, Nadine Mastroleo, Molly Magill, Nancy Barnett, and Kate Carey . 2014. In-Session Processes of Brief Motivational Interventions in Two Trials With Mandated College Students. Vol. 83 (08 . 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brian Borsari, John TP Hustad, Nadine R Mastroleo, Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw, Nancy P Barnett, Christopher W Kahler, Erica Eaton Short, and Peter M Monti . 2012. Addressing alcohol use and problems in mandated college students: a randomized clinical trial using stepped care. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Vol. 80, 6 (2012), 1062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kate B Carey, James M Henson, Michael P Carey, and Stephen A Maisto . 2009. Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Vol. 77, 1 (2009), 74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Degottex, J. Kane, T. Drugman, T. Raitio, and S. Scherer . 2014. COVAREP -- A collaborative voice analysis repository for speech technologies 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 960--964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mortaza Doulaty, Oscar Saz, Raymond W.M. Ng, and Thomas Hain . 2016. Automatic Genre and Show Identification of Broadcast Media Interspeech 2016. 2115--2119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rahul Gupta, Panayiotis Georgiou, David Atkins, and Shrikanth Narayanan . 2014. Predicting client's inclination towards target behavior change in motivational interviewing and investigating the role of laughter. (01 . 2014), 208--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rahul Gupta, Nishant Nath, Taruna Agrawal, Panayiotis Georgiou, David C. Atkins, and Shrikanth S. Narayanan . 2016. Laughter Valence Prediction in Motivational Interviewing Based on Lexical and Acoustic Cues. In Proceedings of Interspeech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaoran Liu, Carlos Ishi, and Hiroshi Ishiguro . 2017. Turn-Taking Estimation Model Based on Joint Embedding of Lexical and Prosodic Contents. In Proc. Interspeech 2017. 1686--1690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gale Lucas, Giota Stratou, Shari Lieblich, and Jonathan Gratch . 2016. Trust Me: Multimodal Signals of Trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Brad Lundahl and Brian L. Burke . 2009. The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Psychology Vol. 65, 11 (11 . 2009), 1232--1245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Brad W. Lundahl, Chelsea Kunz, Cynthia Brownell, Derrik Tollefson, and Brian L. Burke . 2010. A Meta-Analysis of Motivational Interviewing: Twenty-Five Years of Empirical Studies. Research on Social Work Practice Vol. 20, 2 (2010), 137--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Molly Magill, Timothy R. Apodaca, Brian E. Borsari, Jacques Gaume, Ariel Hoadley, Rebecca E F Gordon, J Scott Tonigan, and Theresa B. Moyers . 2018. A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process: Technical, relational, and conditional process models of change. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Vol. 86 2 (2018), 140--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Molly Magill, Jacques Gaume, Timothy R. Apodaca, Justin Walthers, Nadine R. Mastroleo, Brian E. Borsari, and Richard Longabaugh . 2014. The technical hypothesis of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of MI's key causal model. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Vol. 82 6 (2014), 973--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Renata K. Martins and Daniel W. McNeil . 2009. Review of Motivational Interviewing in promoting health behaviors. Clinical Psychology Review Vol. 29, 4 (2009), 283 -- 293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gideon Mendels, Sarah Ita Levitan, Kai-Zhan Lee, and Julia Hirschberg . 2017. Hybrid Acoustic-Lexical Deep Learning Approach for Deception Detection Proc. Interspeech 2017. 1472--1476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. William Richard Miller, Theresa B Moyers, Denise Ernst, and Paul Amrhein . 2008. Manual for the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC). Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (Jan . 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. William R. Miller and Stephen Rollnick . 2013. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change (bibinfoedition3rd ed.). Guilford Publ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Brian T. Pace, Aaron Dembe, Christina S. Soma, Scott A. Baldwin, David C. Atkins, and Zac E. Imel . 2017. A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Vol. 31, 5 (08 . 2017), 524--533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D. Manning . 2014. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 1532--1543. deftempurl%http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14--1162 tempurlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Moises H. R. Pereira, Flávio L. C. Pádua, Adriano C. M. Pereira, Fabr'ıcio Benevenuto, and Daniel Hasan Dalip . 2016. Fusing Audio, Textual and Visual Features for Sentiment Analysis of News Videos. CoRR Vol. abs/1604.02612 (2016). showeprint{arxiv}1604.02612deftempurl%http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.02612 tempurlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Soujanya Poria, Erik Cambria, Newton Howard, G L Huang, and Amir Hussain . 2016. Fusing audio, visual and textual clues for sentiment analysis from multimodal content. Neurocomputing Vol. 174 (2016), 50--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mia Romano and Lorna Peters . 2016. Understanding the process of motivational interviewing: A review of the relational and technical hypotheses. Psychotherapy Research Vol. 26, 2 (2016), 220--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. B. Xiao, D. Can, P. G. Georgiou, D. Atkins, and S. S. Narayanan . 2012. Analyzing the language of therapist empathy in Motivational Interview based psychotherapy. In Proceedings of The 2012 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multimodal Analysis of Client Behavioral Change Coding in Motivational Interviewing

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICMI '18: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
            October 2018
            687 pages
            ISBN:9781450356923
            DOI:10.1145/3242969

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 October 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            ICMI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate63of149submissions,42%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader